CPA Australia Financial Planning Specialisation

The CPA brand is an established sign of excellence. Members of CPA Australia are recognised as leaders in business, finance and accounting advice.

The CPA Australia Financial Planning Specialisation (FPS) builds on this expertise and specifically recognises members who specialise in financial planning with a high level of experience and knowledge in the financial services industry.

To ensure the FPS remains a mark of expertise and professionalism, CPA Australia has reviewed the current requirements to attain the specialisation.

The guide (PDF) to the new pathway to FPS and the new application form (PDF) are now available.

New Pathway 2012

To ensure the financial planning specialisation (FPS) remains a mark of expertise and professionalism, CPA Australia has reviewed the current requirements to attain the specialisation. The criteria and the points system will be replaced with a new pathway which will focus on education and experience.

New FPS Pathway

Under the new pathway, CPA Australia members will be required to complete a degree or postgraduate qualification majoring in financial planning to attain the specialisation. The FPA CFP Education Program will also be recognised as meeting this requirement.

In addition, members will be required to complete specific education in tax, either through their qualification or through completion of the "Taxation" or "Advanced Taxation" segments of the CPA Program professional level. Members who are registered tax agents will be exempt from this requirement.

Members will be required to have a minimum of three years experience in financial planning in the immediate past five years. This must include experience in:

  • the personal financial planning process
  • personal income tax planning
  • risk management planning
  • investment planning

The CPA Australia Financial Planning Specialisation guide (PDF) explains the new pathway to attain the specialisation. Members can apply for the specialisation under the new pathway using the new application form (PDF)

Existing pathway – the points system

Note: A transition period commenced on 1 February 2012, during which both pathways will be available to members. Applications for the specialisation under the existing criteria will close 30 June 2013.

The existing pathway to attain the specialisation is based on a points system, where a minimum of 100 points must be accrued. A minimum of 20 points each must be earned from these three areas: education and learning, experience and examination. The remaining 40 points can be obtained in either experience or education and learning.

The number of points earned will be based on a combination of the number of hours and the type of experience gained within the past five years. Experience falls into six categories: personal financial planning process, personal income tax planning, risk management planning, investment planning, retirement planning and estate planning. Points can be earned from training courses through to post-graduate degrees, with the number of points allocated according to the level of study completed. All courses must have an assessable component.

All members must pass an examination, worth 20 application points, based on existing legislation at the date of the exam. Before you enrol for the FPS exam, you should complete the online self-assessment tool to confirm that you meet both the experience and education criteria. The FPS exam is held in each state at CPA Australia divisional offices and the enrolment fee is $220.00.

The dates for the 2012 FPS examination are:

  • Friday 25 May
  • Friday 16 November

To register your interest for an examination please email your name and member number to finplan@cpaaustralia.com.au

Sample exam questions

Note: These exam questions are based on legislation existing in May 2012.

Q.

Personal income tax planning

As part of your financial advice to Jenny, you recommend that she salary sacrifices $100 of her weekly pay into her superannuation fund to help plan for her retirement.
Which of the following statements is correct?

I If the salary sacrifice arrangement is effective, the additional superannuation contributions will not be assessable income derived by Jenny.
II To be an effective salary sacrifice arrangement, Jenny must forego her entitlement to her wage before she performs the work to earn that income.
III To be an effective salary sacrifice arrangement Jenny can, after performing the work but before she is paid, forego her entitlement to her wage.
IV If the salary sacrifice arrangement is not effective, the additional superannuation contributions will be exempt income to Jenny.

A I only.
B I and II only.
C I and III only.
D II and IV only.

A.

The correct answer is B.

An effective salary sacrifice arrangement (SSA) involves an employee contractually foregoing a future entitlement to salary or wages before that entitlement becomes presently existing.

Prospective SSA arrangements are not assessable income of the employee. Retrospective arrangements are not an effective SSA. If the SSA is not effective then the proposed contributions will not be exempt income but form part of the normal income of the employee.

Q.

Investment planning

The 'Random Walk Hypothesis' states that:

A fundamental analysis is the best tool to use to identify undervalued shares in the stock market.
B share price movements can best be predicted through the use of “charting” or technical analysis.
C the best way to invest in the share market is through the use of trading rules based on past share prices.
D the price movements of shares are unpredictable, and therefore security analysis will not help to predict future market behaviour.

A.

The correct answer is D.

The random walk hypothesis states that share prices move in a statistically random manner and that future prices cannot be predicted.

Q.

Retirement planning

Norman retired in August 2008 at age 64 with $330 000 in superannuation. Of this amount, only $30 000 was a tax-free component. Norman cashed out the whole balance and re contributed it as a non-concessional contribution before starting his account-based pension.

When Norman died in March 2011, the balance of his account-based pension had grown to $350 000 despite having taken income of $25 000 since commencement. His only dependant is his 43 year old daughter Narelle, who is mentally handicapped, and she receives the entire death benefit.

How much tax will Narelle pay on the $350 000 death benefit?

A She will pay no tax.
B She will pay 16.5 per cent tax on the $20 000 growth ($3 300).
C She will pay 16.5 per cent tax on the $45 000 growth ($7 425).
D She will pay 16.5 per cent tax on the whole $350 000 balance ($57 750).

A.

The correct answer is A.

Narelle is a financial dependant hence receives the entire benefit tax-free.